|
|
Home | Notes
Contributors
Archives | Search
Links | About
contact:
editor@ExileStreet.com
..........
Ralph Peters
Latest

Looking for Trouble: Adventures in a Broken World
Ralph Peters
..........
Julia Gorin

Clintonisms
by Julia Gorin
..........

Wounded
Warrior
Please
Help Those
Who Protect Us
..........
Burt Prelutsky

The Secret of Their
Success
by Burt Prelutsky
..........
.........
Burt Prelutsky

Conservatives Are From Mars, Liberals Are From San Francisco
by Burt Prelutsky
..........

..........
|
|
Nightline
Does North Korea, Part 2
Soft pedaling tyranny…
[by Roger Aronoff] 8/16/05
As I commented
in a previous column, an ABC news crew recently went to North
Korea for a Nightline episode, and segments on World News Tonight
and Good Morning America. They were the first American news
team there since Madeleine Albright’s trip in 2000. ABC
director of foreign news Chuck Lustig told Daily Variety that
though they were closely monitored, they had been allowed to
go nearly every place they had requested. The once exception
was the Yongbyon nuclear facilities, which is where, it is
believed, that they produce their weapons-grade uranium.
After explaining
how the North Koreans tell their people that the Korean War
was started by the U.S., correspondent Bob Woodruff said that
the North Koreans feel like they’re under a real threat
from the U.S. and says it began with President Bush labeling
them an axis-of-evil country. What really frightened them,
Woodruff reported, was when they read Bob Woodward’s
book, Plan of Attack, in April of 2004 when it came out. Woodruff
said that the book led them to believe that Secretary of Defense
Donald Rumsfeld was planning a secret invasion of North Korea.
He said that they came away with the idea that if they had
nuclear weapons, the U.S. wouldn’t invade, but if they
didn’t, we would. Woodruff said that was the point at
which they decided to go ahead with their nuclear program.
The North
Korean vice foreign minister and lead negotiator told Woodruff
that they do have nuclear weapons and will continue to build
more. ABC News producer Clark Bentson said the whole diplomatic
confrontation was because the N. Koreans had their feelings
hurt by being called an “outpost of tyranny.” That
was stated over and over, he said. What they want from us is
an apology, and to start treating them like equal partners.
And here
is where ABC let its viewers down. They made no effort to explain
that the North Korean claim that they decided to resume their
nuclear program in 2004 was patently false. The 1994 Agreed
Framework that the Clinton administration had negotiated, with
the help of former President Jimmy Carter, had failed long
ago. The basic agreement was that the North Koreans would freeze
its nuclear program at Yongbyon, and the U.S. and South Korea
would build them light-water reactors and provide them with
massive fuel and food aid. In the following years, North Korea
continued test-firing missiles over Japan, and selling missile
technology to other rogue nations.
It became
clear to many in Congress and the CIA in the mid and late 1990s
that the North Koreans were violating the agreement, but the
Clinton administration claimed the agreement was working. The
agreement finally came to an end when the North Korean officials
admitted to having had a nuclear weapons program in an October
2002 meeting with U.S. Assistant Secretary of State James Kelly
and again in 2003. While some critics questioned the validity
of these claims by the Bush administration, the former Secretary
of State under Clinton, Madeleine Albright, said on Meet the
Press in 2004, when asked by Tim Russert as to whether or not
they had developed a nuclear weapon under Bill Clinton’s
watch: “No. What they were doing, as it turns out, they
were cheating.”
On the same
day this Nightline episode aired, Democratic Senators Hillary
Clinton and Carl Levin co-authored a column in the Washington
Post calling for a massive aid program for North Korea. They
wrote, “Thus, while the administration wrangled internally
about whether to negotiate seriously with North Korea, Pyongyang
was using the time to break out as a nuclear power.” Hillary
claimed that the North Koreans had used these past five years
to become “a nuclear weapons state.” And she called
for an aid package, saying, “Seriousness is demonstrated
by spelling out a package to the North Koreans that addresses
their fundamental need for economic assistance. It is demonstrated
by rhetorical restraint.”
So here we
have Hillary Clinton calling for another appeasement package
for the North Koreans, though the last one allowed them to
continue with their program while becoming the largest recipient
of U.S. aid in all of Asia. Clearly they could use a serious
aid package, but based on past experience, it would again be
used to further entrench the tyrannical government while enabling
the continued repression of the people. What is really needed,
somehow, is regime change. Ideally it would come in the form
of reunification, under the capitalistic and democratic South
Korean government, and without war.
Foreign news
director Chuck Lustig told Daily Variety that “I
hope we prove that ABC News is fair and objective in its reporting
on North Korea and we will be invited back.” I suspect
North Korea will feel that way and invite them back. But how
about fair and objective reporting for the U.S. as well. tRO
copyright
2005 Accuracy in Media
§
|
|
|